• Every dose printed on the panel
  • Prices shown per serving
  • Cautions printed on the page
  • 30-day money-back guarantee
Which routine is right for you?See your routine

Research review

Valerian root vs melatonin: what the evidence says about each

Melatonin's sleep-onset evidence, pooled across 19 trials in 1,683 people, is larger and more consistent than valerian's. Valerian's own reviews disagree with each other, and the more rigorous and recent the trial, the less likely it is to find a benefit over placebo. No trial has compared the two head-to-head.

By Electric Tiger Editorial

The evidence doesn't support valerian root as equivalent to melatonin for falling asleep faster. Melatonin's trial base for sleep-onset latency is larger and more consistent; valerian's own systematic reviews disagree with each other, and the most recent, most rigorous ones found no significant benefit over placebo. No trial has compared the two directly.

What the evidence doesn't support

It doesn't support valerian root as comparable to melatonin's evidence for shortening the time it takes to fall asleep — the two literatures aren't the same size or the same quality. It doesn't support treating either one as a treatment for insomnia or any diagnosed sleep disorder; both are discussed here as studied supplements, not medications. And it doesn't support a claim that combining them works better than either alone, since that combination hasn't been tested (see valerian root and melatonin: what the evidence says).

What the trials found

Melatonin's evidence for falling asleep faster is the larger and more consistent of the two. A 2013 meta-analysis pooled 19 randomized, placebo-controlled trials, 1,683 people total, in adults and children with primary sleep disorders. Sleep-onset latency fell by 7.06 minutes and total sleep time rose by 8.25 minutes compared with placebo; overall sleep quality also improved. Higher doses and longer trials were linked to larger effects, and the authors themselves called the benefit modest next to prescription treatments for insomnia while noting a comparatively mild side-effect profile (PMID 23691095).

Valerian's picture is more mixed. A 2024 umbrella review of 8 systematic reviews concluded that valerian has a good safety profile but does not have empirical support for treating insomnia when judged by objective or quantitative sleep measures — despite being one of the most widely used herbal sleep aids (PMID 38359657). A 2007 review of 37 studies reached a similar conclusion in its own title, "safe but not effective," finding that the most recent and methodologically rigorous trials showed no significant sleep benefit over placebo (PMID 17517355).

Valerian's larger meta-analyses show why the field is split. A 2006 pooled analysis of 16 trials found a statistically significant benefit on a simple yes/no measure of whether sleep improved, but the authors flagged evidence of publication bias in that result (PMID 17145239). A 2010 meta-analysis of 18 trials found the same pattern — a modest benefit on the yes/no measure, but no significant difference on quantitative measures like sleep-onset time or a standardized sleep-quality score (PMID 20347389). A 2020 review pooling 10 trials with numeric outcomes found a small, not-statistically-significant effect overall, with whole root numerically outperforming extract in a small subgroup (PMID 33086877).

No study has run valerian and melatonin against each other in the same trial. Comparing the two literatures side by side is useful context for how much evidence backs each one; it isn't a head-to-head result.

Melatonin Valerian root
Best evidence 19-trial meta-analysis, n=1,683 Multiple meta-analyses that disagree with each other; a 2024 umbrella review found no support on objective measures
Sleep-onset latency effect -7.06 min vs placebo No significant difference on quantitative measures in the most rigorous reviews
Total sleep time effect +8.25 min vs placebo Not consistently significant across reviews
Head-to-head trial None exists

Questions people ask

Which is better, valerian root or melatonin, for sleep?

Based on trial volume and consistency, melatonin's evidence for sleep-onset latency is larger and more consistent than valerian's. That's a statement about the size and consistency of each literature, not a recommendation, and no trial has compared the two directly.

Is valerian root as good as melatonin?

The evidence doesn't support that comparison. Melatonin's trial base is bigger and its findings hold up better under quantitative measurement; valerian's largest reviews disagree with each other, and the most rigorous ones found no significant benefit over placebo.

Valerian root vs melatonin vs magnesium?

Melatonin's sleep-onset evidence is also larger and more consistent than magnesium's — see magnesium glycinate vs melatonin. No trial has run all three against each other.

Can you take valerian root and melatonin together?

That's answered separately at valerian root and melatonin: what the evidence says — no trial has tested the combination.

When to talk to a doctor

Trouble sleeping that persists or affects daily life is worth bringing to a doctor rather than working through supplements alone. Neither valerian root nor melatonin is a treatment for insomnia or a diagnosed sleep disorder, and nothing above supports using either as a substitute for medical evaluation. If you're pregnant, nursing, or take a prescription medication — especially anything sedating — talk to a doctor before adding either one.

Sources

  1. Valerian for sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis The American journal of medicine · 2006 · PMID 17145239A 2006 meta-analysis of 16 trials found a modest benefit for valerian on a simple yes/no sleep-quality measure, but flagged publication bias, wide dose variation (225-1,215 mg/day), and no significant difference in side effects versus placebo.
  2. Effectiveness of Valerian on insomnia: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials Sleep medicine · 2010 · PMID 20347389An 18-trial meta-analysis found valerian modestly outperformed placebo on a simple improved/not-improved measure but showed no significant difference on quantitative sleep-latency or sleep-quality scores.
  3. Valerian Root in Treating Sleep Problems and Associated Disorders-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Journal of evidence-based integrative medicine · 2020 · PMID 33086877A 2020 systematic review of 60 studies found a small, not-statistically-significant pooled effect of valerian on sleep quality overall, a higher (but still uncertain) effect for whole root versus extract, and high heterogeneity in its anxiety meta-analysis; individual trial results ranged from no effect to modest subjective improvement.
  4. Does valerian work for insomnia? An umbrella review of the evidence European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024 · PMID 38359657A 2024 umbrella review of 8 systematic reviews found valerian has a good safety record but no confirmed effect on insomnia by objective sleep measures, despite common use and subjective reports of improvement.
  5. A systematic review of valerian as a sleep aid: safe but not effective Sleep medicine reviews · 2007 · PMID 17517355A 2007 review titled 'safe but not effective' found valerian's most rigorous, recent trials showed no significant sleep benefit over placebo, while confirming a generally safe profile with rare adverse events.
  6. Meta-analysis: melatonin for the treatment of primary sleep disorders PloS one · 2013 · PMID 23691095Pooling 19 trials in 1,683 people, melatonin shortened time to fall asleep by about 7 minutes and added about 8 minutes of total sleep versus placebo.

*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.